CASTE CENSUS AND RESERVATION

What is a Caste Census?

  • A caste census records individuals’ caste identities during the national census.
  • Helps understand the distribution and socio-economic status of caste groups.
  • Aids in designing affirmative action, reservation policies, and targeted welfare schemes.

Historical Context

British Era (1881–1931):

  • Caste enumeration was part of decadal censuses.
  • Used to classify population by caste, religion, and occupation.
  • Helped the British implement divide-and-rule policies.

Post-Independence (1951 onwards):

  • 1951 Census: First census of independent India.
    • Caste enumeration discontinued (except for SCs and STs).
    • Aim: Avoid reinforcing caste divisions in a newly independent nation.

1961 Directive:

  • Central government permitted states to conduct their own OBC surveys.
  • State-specific OBC lists were compiled independently.
  • No national caste enumeration for OBCs was conducted.

Mandal Commission (1979–80):

  • Identified OBCs using 11 socio-educational indicators.
  • Used 1931 Census data and limited field surveys (~1% of households).
  • Estimated OBCs at 52% of the population.
  • Recommended periodic reviews of reservation lists every 20 years.
  • Emphasized reservations as temporary uplift tools, not permanent entitlements.

Recent Developments

  • 2011 SECC (Socio-Economic and Caste Census):
    • Last national-level attempt to collect caste and socio-economic data.
    • Faced criticism due to data inconsistencies and lack of release of caste-specific data.
  • Current Scenario:
    • Rising political and social demand for updated caste data.
    • Government has now approved caste enumeration in the upcoming national census.
    • Seen as a move to inform policy-making and social justice frameworks.

Constitutional and Legal Constraints:

  • Article 16(4): Reservation for “inadequately represented” backward classes in public employment.
  • Indra Sawhney Case (1992):
    • Upheld OBC reservations.
    • Imposed a 50% ceiling on total reservations.
  • Exceptions: Tamil Nadu (69%), EWS Quota (10%), raising questions on ceiling flexibility.

Key Issues Highlighted Over Time:

  • No caste has been removed from OBC lists despite decades of benefits.
  • Supreme Court in Ashok Kumar Thakur vs Union of India (2008) urged periodic reviews.
  • System remains static – no “graduation” of advanced communities out of backward status.

Rohini Commission (2023) – Sub-categorization of OBCs:

  • Found inequitable distribution of OBC reservation benefits.
  • Politically dominant OBC groups captured most benefits.
  • Recommended splitting the 27% OBC quota into sub-quotas for equitable access.
  • Echoed LR Naik’s earlier suggestion in Mandal Commission for ‘Intermediate’ and ‘Depressed’ OBCs.

Challenges of Population-Proportional Reservations:

  • Would require constitutional amendments or reinterpretation.
  • Risk of undermining Article 14 (Right to Equality).
  • Might entrench caste identities instead of reducing them.
  • Could marginalize the remaining 15% general category, causing social friction.

Why a Caste Census Still Matters:

  • Would update empirical data critical for social justice policy.
  • Allows targeted and evidence-based revision of reservation lists.
  • Can help:
    • Exclude castes that have advanced.
    • Include newly disadvantaged groups.
    • Rebalance sub-quotas within communities.

Caste census is essential for data-driven, fair, and evolving policy on reservations. Must balance proportional representation with constitutional principles and long-term goal of a casteless society.

Leave a Reply