CUSTOMARY LAWS STILL RELEVANT IN NE

Customary Laws: An Overview

Definition and Characteristics:

  • Customary Laws: Traditions and practices treated as legal norms due to their cultural and social significance.
  • Components:
  • Customary principles, rules, and codes of conduct.
  • Oral traditions, adaptable and evolving in nature.
  • Enforced by traditional institutions through sanctions.

Traditional Institutions in the Northeast:

  • Role: Act as custodians of customary laws, often functioning as courts at village, regional, and community levels.
  • Examples:
    • Adi: Kebang
    • Apatani: Buliyang
    • Nyishi: Nyelle
    • Tripura Jamatia: Hoda
    • Khasi (Meghalaya): Dorbar Shnong
    • Ao Nagas: Putu Menden

Salient Features of customary laws of ethnic groups of North East:

  • Dispute Resolution:
    • Addresses land, property, family, marriage, and divorce issues.
    • Heavily relies on local traditions without involving modern courts.
  • Inheritance Systems:
    • Most societies are patrilineal, tracing lineage and inheritance through male lines.
    • Few exceptions (e.g., Khasi, Garo, Jaintia – matrilineal).
  • Land Management:
    • Involves jhum cultivation and clan-specific lands.
    • Marital restrictions within clans to maintain lineage purity.
  • Gender Roles:
    • Bride price: Reflects the value of women.
    • Gender biases: Limited inheritance rights and exclusion from decision-making in traditional governance.

Customary Laws and Indian Constitution:

  • Sixth Schedule: Provisions for safeguarding tribal traditions and governance.
  • Special Articles: For Nagaland and Mizoram, recognizing customary practices.
  • Endorsed by colonial studies (e.g., Verrier Elwin’s A Philosophy of NEFA) and Nehru’s Panchsheel principles.

Gender Issues:

  • Gender bias exists in areas like property inheritance and governance roles.
  • Some societies allow situational adjustments, reflecting slow progress toward equity.

Synergy with the Regular Justice System:

  • Tribal justice serves as an alternative dispute redressal mechanism.
  • Legal pluralism facilitates coexistence, as highlighted by the 80th Parliamentary Standing Committee Report.
  • Potential exists for blending tribal and modern systems for holistic justice.

Leave a Reply