FEMINIST IDEOLOGY IN INDIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE

Introduction: Patriarchal Framing of the Constitution

  • The term “founding fathers” of the Indian Constitution highlights the patriarchal and paternalistic framing, ignoring the contributions of the “founding mothers.”
  • Women in the Constituent Assembly actively participated, carrying forward the feminist movement both within and beyond the Assembly.

Historical Context

  • Achyut Chetan’s Argument: The Constitution reflects the will, consent, and dissent of women, marking it as a significant milestone in Indian feminism.
  • Christine Keating’s Analysis: Women were constitutionally subjugated by maintaining discriminatory personal laws while granting equality in the public sphere, forming a “postcolonial sexual contract.”

Role of the Founding Mothers

  • Formed an alliance with B.R. Ambedkar to challenge social and cultural patriarchy.
  • Amrit Kaur’s Assertion (1932): Indian women rejected male-dominated societal standards, advocating for breaking patriarchal norms.

Fight for Fundamental Rights and the Uniform Civil Code (UCC)

  • The founding mothers conceptualized Fundamental Rights as tools to protect inherent freedoms, curbing patriarchal power in family and religion.
  • Hansa Mehta and Amrit Kaur: Advocated for including the UCC in Fundamental Rights to arrest patriarchal influences.
  • Although relegated to the Directive Principles, these women played a crucial role in elevating the importance of the Directive Principles in constitutional jurisprudence during the 1980s.

Secularism and Religious Freedom

  • Begum Aizaz Rasul: Stated secularism as the Constitution’s most significant feature.
  • Hansa Mehta: Opposed unrestricted religious freedom, advocating for limiting religious practices that curtailed women’s equality.
  • Amrit Kaur’s Dissent: Highlighted how unbridled religious freedom could invalidate progressive laws like the Widow Remarriage Act or the abolition of sati, maintaining discriminatory practices like purdah and polygamy.

Challenges and Missed Opportunities

  • Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay’s View: Initially celebrated the Constitution as a promise of equality and justice for women, but this optimism faded.
  • 1974 Report: The “Towards Equality” report revealed India’s failure to achieve equality for women even after two decades of independence.

Contemporary Reflection

  • The absence of feminist stateswomen and jurists has weakened feminist constitutionalism in modern India.
  • The Uniform Civil Code, intended to address gender injustice, remains unfulfilled despite its inclusion as a promise by the founding figures.

Leave a Reply