Tag: 1991

The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, aimed at preserving the religious character of places of worship as they stood on August 15, 1947, faces legal challenges. The Shahi Jama Masjid dispute in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, has reignited debates on the Act’s applicability. The Shahi Jama Masjid Dispute Background: Petitioners claim the mosque, built around 1528 by Mir Hindu Beg, stands on an ancient Hari Har Mandir (Hindu temple). Architectural features, including stone masonry with dome and arches, suggest ties to pre-existing structures. Similar disputes exist in Varanasi (Gyanvapi) and Mathura (Krishna Janmabhoomi). Judicial and Administrative Involvement: A Sambhal district court ordered a survey; clashes ensued after a second attempt. The site is protected under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904, and recognized as a Monument of National Importance by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). Conflict with the Act: Petitioners challenge the Places of Worship Act, 1991, which forbids changing a site's religious identity post-1947. The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 Purpose: Preserve religious status of worship places and maintain communal harmony. Key Provisions: Section 3: Prohibits religious conversions of sites. Section 4(1): Mandates maintaining the religious status of sites as on August 15, 1947. Section 4(2): Stops legal proceedings over conversion disputes before the Act. Section 5 (Exceptions): Exempts Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi and certain ancient sites under the 1958 Act. Section 6: Prescribes penalties for violation, including imprisonment up to 3 years. Supreme Court Observations: Allowed inquiries into sites' religious character without changing their identity (May 2022). Concerns associated with the Act Judicial Overreach: Limits judicial review and undermines the judiciary's role in dispute resolution. Cutoff Date: The 1947 cutoff date is criticized as arbitrary and restrictive for reclaiming places by communities. Inconsistencies: Exemptions, such as Ayodhya, raise concerns of bias and selectivity. Communal Impact: Legal debates often escalate tensions, impacting India’s secular fabric. Political Misuse: Risks of turning religious site issues into electoral or ideological tools. Way Forward Judicial Clarifications: The Supreme Court must define clear guidelines for the Act’s application. De-politicization: Religious disputes must be resolved without political interference. Prevent Local Overreach: Jurisdiction of lower courts needs limits to avoid exacerbating sensitive issues. Community Harmony: Fostering unity over divisions through education, dialogue, and shared cultural narratives. The Shahi Jama Masjid dispute underscores the complexities surrounding historical and religious claims in India. A balanced interpretation of the Places of Worship Act, ensuring both legal clarity and communal harmony, is vital to preserving India's secular and pluralistic identity.

Tag: 1991

THE PLACES OF WORSHIP (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT, 1991

Let's Crack
APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack
APSC Together