Tag: ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN RESTRICTING LIVE COVERAGE OF DEFENCE OPERATIONS

The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (I&B) issued an April 2025 advisory urging media to avoid live coverage of defence operations post-Pahalgam attack. Justification: Operational secrecy and national security. Criticism: Potential threat to press freedom, transparency, and democratic accountability. Ethical Dilemmas in Restricting Live Coverage National Security vs. Press Freedom Prevents tactical leaks (e.g., 26/11 Mumbai) but challenges the media’s watchdog role. Operational Effectiveness vs. Public Transparency Secrecy helps military success (e.g., Kargil), but public loses visibility on government actions. Legal Compliance vs. Ethical Journalism Legal restrictions vs. ethical obligation to report truth (e.g., human rights violations). State Authority vs. Media Autonomy Regulating reporting helps fight disinformation but risks normalizing censorship. Immediate Safety vs. Long-Term Democratic Health Temporary security gains may lead to long-term suppression of dissent and oversight. Regulating Media is Critical for National Security & Democracy Avoids Hostile Exploitation Real-time coverage can help enemies (e.g., during 26/11 and Kargil). Protects Security Personnel Limits exposure of troop movements and strategies. Maintains Public Trust via Controlled Transparency Prevents misinformation and panic (e.g., Kandahar hijacking). Ensures Legal-Ethical Alignment Supports responsible journalism without jeopardizing national safety. Philosophical Perspectives Utilitarianism: Ends justify means—restrict if it prevents harm, but watch for overreach. Deontology (Kantian Ethics): Truth-telling is a moral duty; censorship must be universally justified. Virtue Ethics: State must act with prudence; media must balance courage with restraint. Communitarian Ethics: Media should prioritize collective safety over individual freedom. Solutions for Balancing Security and Ethical Journalism Structured Official Briefings Adopt the Kargil model—accurate, safe, and timely information dissemination. Self-Regulatory Media Guidelines Voluntary conduct codes and UK-style D-Notice collaboration system. Legal Safeguards Include sunset clauses and judicial oversight to prevent permanent censorship. Media–Security Force Collaboration Joint training, embedded reporting with ground rules, trust-building. Public Awareness Campaigns Educate on the dangers of real-time reporting; promote ethical war journalism. A balanced democracy requires neither total press freedom nor absolute state control. Collaborative regulation, transparency, and mutual trust between state and media ensure both security and liberty thrive.

Tag: ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN RESTRICTING LIVE COVERAGE OF DEFENCE OPERATIONS

ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN RESTRICTING LIVE COVERAGE OF DEFENCE OPERATIONS

Let's Crack
APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack
APSC Together