Tag: LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP

The Konda Reddi tribe in Andhra Pradesh has embraced live-in relationships as a cultural shift to avoid the financial burdens of traditional weddings. About live-in relationship A live-in relationship means living together before marriage. It is a domestic cohabitation between unmarried couples. Key Supreme Court Judgments on Live-in Relationships: Badri Prasad v. Dy. Director of Consolidation (1978): The Supreme Court recognized live-in relationships as legal if they fulfill marriage-like conditions, including legal age, mutual consent, and mental capacity. Lalita Toppo v. The State of Jharkhand (2018): The Court ruled that live-in partners are entitled to greater protection under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDVA 2005), than under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Bharatha Matha v. R. Vijay Renganathan & Ors (2010): Children born from live-in relationships were declared legitimate and entitled to a share in ancestral undivided property. Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013): The Court affirmed that mutual live-in relationships between unmarried individuals are not illegal and do not constitute an offense. Impact of Live-in Relationships: Pros and Cons Pros Freedom and Autonomy: Allows individuals to make independent choices about their personal lives, free from societal or familial pressures associated with marriage. Testing Compatibility: Provides a platform for partners to assess emotional, financial, and domestic compatibility before committing to marriage. Avoiding Legal Complexities: Simplifies relationships by avoiding lengthy legal and social formalities of marriage while still fostering companionship. Reduced Social Stigma: With urbanization and globalization, younger generations view live-in relationships as a modern, progressive lifestyle choice, contributing to changing societal norms. Flexibility in Commitment: Offers the freedom to walk away from an unsatisfactory relationship without the legal complications of divorce. Economic and Practical Considerations: Partners can share financial responsibilities like rent and expenses without the legal bindings of marriage. Legal Recognition: Judicial rulings in India ensure certain rights and protections for individuals in live-in relationships, such as property inheritance for children and relief under the Domestic Violence Act. Cons Social Stigma: Despite increasing acceptance, live-in relationships are still taboo in conservative communities, often leading to societal judgment and ostracism. Lack of Legal Framework: Unlike marriage, live-in relationships are not fully governed by laws, leaving partners vulnerable in cases of disputes or separation. Emotional Instability: The absence of formal commitment can lead to insecurity and uncertainty in the relationship. Impact on Family Structures: Challenges traditional family values and can cause generational conflicts, particularly in conservative households. Vulnerability for Women and Children: Women in live-in relationships may face exploitation, and children born from these relationships may encounter societal bias despite legal recognition. Potential for Misuse: The informal nature of live-in relationships can sometimes be misused to avoid responsibilities or commitments typically associated with marriage. Economic Disputes: Financial disagreements or lack of clear asset division agreements can create conflict, especially in the absence of legal frameworks like prenuptial agreements. Cultural Backlash: In some areas, live-in relationships face resistance from religious or cultural groups, sometimes leading to harassment or violence.

Tag: LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP

LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP

Let's Crack
APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack
APSC Together