Tag: PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL)

SC judge Justice Nagarathna flags misuse of PILs Misuse of PILs: Supreme Court Judge Justice BV Nagarathna flagged the misuse of Public Interest Litigations (PILs), saying they are now viewed with suspicion due to the actions of a few. Loss of Virtue: Originally a “virtuous weapon” for the weak, PILs are losing their essence and being misused for personal, publicity, and financial interests. Justice Nagarathna spoke at the release of Law, Justice, Society: Selected Works of Upendra Baxi, acknowledging his role in highlighting PILs as a tool for holding the state accountable. Call for Genuine PILs: She emphasized the need for real public interest litigation or “social action litigation” as envisioned by Baxi. Constitutional Perspective: She praised Baxi’s writings for portraying the Indian Constitution as a dynamic document embodying justice, governance, and transformation. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India As per Janata Dal v. H.S. Chaudhary (1993), PIL is a legal action initiated for the enforcement of public interest affecting legal rights or liabilities. Objective: Ensures access to justice for the underprivileged, enabling the judiciary to protect fundamental rights. Origin: Concept evolved in the USA (1960s) and later adopted in India. Relaxation of Locus Standi: Any public-spirited citizen or organization can file PIL, even if not directly affected. Constitutional Provisions Article 32 & Article 226: Empower the Supreme Court and High Courts to hear PIL petitions. Features of PIL Not defined in the Constitution or statute. Different from traditional litigation: It is non-adversarial and focuses on public welfare. Proactive role of courts: Judiciary intervenes in policy matters affecting larger social interests. Flexible procedures: PIL allows liberalized procedural requirements while maintaining judicial decorum. Evolution of PIL in India Mumbai Kamagar Sabha vs. Abdul Thai (1976): Justice Krishna Iyer emphasized PIL’s role in serving the poor. The first reported case of PIL was Hussainara Khatoon vs. State of Bihar (1979) that focused on the inhuman conditions of prisons and under trial prisoners that led to the release of more than 40,000 under trial prisoners. Right to speedy justice emerged as a basic fundamental right which had been denied to these prisoners. The same set pattern was adopted in subsequent cases. P. Gupta vs. Union of India (1981): Opened PIL to individuals and social groups for addressing violations of constitutional rights. Significance of PIL Expanded Article 32: Allowed judicial activism for public welfare. Access to justice: Enabled marginalized communities to seek redress. Strengthened judiciary: Empowered courts to take suo motu actions on public matters. Social and political impact: Addressed key socio-economic and environmental issues. Rights of the marginalized: Protected bonded laborers, prisoners, slum dwellers, and others. Important Judgements Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India (1984): Ordered the release and rehabilitation of bonded labourers. Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra vs. State of U.P. (1985): Recognized the right to a healthy environment under Article 21. MC Mehta vs. Union of India (1987): Introduced absolute liability for environmental harm. PUCL vs. Union of India (1997): Addressed custodial deaths and upheld human dignity under Article 21. Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan (1997): Led to legal frameworks for preventing sexual harassment at workplaces. Challenges in PIL Misuse: Often exploited for personal, political, or financial interests. Judicial backlog: Overburdens the judiciary, leading to delays. Lack of enforcement: Many PIL verdicts lack proper implementation. Judicial overreach: Courts sometimes interfere in executive functions. Way Forward Strict scrutiny: Ensure PILs serve genuine public interest. Guidelines adherence: Follow Supreme Court's framework to prevent misuse. Speedy disposal: Address delays through judicial reforms. Accountability measures: Ensure effective implementation of court rulings. Public awareness: Educate citizens on the responsible use of PILs. PIL remains a powerful tool for justice, but its ethical usage is essential to uphold its true purpose.

Tag: PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL)

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL)

Let's Crack
APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack APSC Together

Quick Links

Newsletter

Subscribe for Updates

Let's Crack
APSC Together